Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Can vaccines cause infertility?

Can vaccines cause infertility?

Source:
http://beforeitsnews.com/health/2011/11/secret-sterilizing-ingredients-in-many-vaccines-1424285.html

Vaccines contain many ingredients that are potentially damaging to fertility including detergents like triton X-100, also known as octoxynol 10 which is a known spermicide and has been used in experiments to “strip” sperm so that they are no longer capable of fertilizing an egg. In a 1977 study in the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, triton X-100 was listed in a table of “most potent spermicides” that would produce 100% stripping of human sperm and the dosages needed for such an effect.
Octoxynol 10 (Triton X-100) is contained in vaccines. The data sheet for Fluarix vaccine says:
“FLUARIX (influenza virus vaccine) does not contain thimerosal. Each 0.5-mL dose also contains octoxynol-10 (TRITON X-100) and polysorbate 80 (Tween 80).”
Octoxynol 9 (or 10) typically contain traces of the toxins ethylene oxide, dioxane, C9 phenols, or glycol ether.
It is also in other flu vaccines such as pandemrix and vaxigrip vaccines.
Polysorbate 80 Causes Infertility
Another ingredient that is problematic is polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80) that is in numerous vaccines including the Pediacel five-in-one vaccine given to infants and the gardasil HPV vaccine. Polysorbate 80 is a known sterility causing agent in rats. It caused changes to the vagina and womb, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles and this impaired the rats’ ability to reproduce.
Some medical professionals argue that it has only been found to cause infertility in rats, not humans, but the Depo-Provera contraceptive shot also contains polysorbate 80 and it has been added to experimental animal contraceptive injections as one of the ideal sterilizing ingredients.
Baby female rats who were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth had caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.
According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80). As it is a preferred ingredient, scientists are obviously aware of its ability to cause infertility.
Squalene (shark liver oil) is used in the H1N1, HPV and anthrax vaccines, as well as others, as an adjuvant to make the recipient produce more antibodies and also to spread out the vaccine so they can make more of it for less money.
It has been implicated in the devastating immune dysfunctions of the soldiers who suffered from Gulf War Syndrome, many of whom returned from the Gulf with infertility problems. Soldiers in America were so worried about the military vaccination programme making them infertile that they were freezing their sperm before they had any vaccines.
Polysorbate 80 and Squalene Together are Ideal Sterilizing Agents
Far from being mere anecdotal reports, scientists are aware that an ideal sterilizing recipe is polysorbate 80 and squalene oil together, as they demonstrated in this patent for an animal contraceptive vaccine:
“In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.”
This is exactly what some vaccines contain. In fact, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System lists 25 pages of teenage girls and women who had miscarriages after being injected with Gardasil when pregnant, and that is just for one type of vaccine.
[Source: Before it is News]

Octoxynol-9 (Nonionic Surfactant) Based Spermicides. Octoxynol-9 (also known as Triton X-100) is made with a different chemical than N-9 but is still a nonionic surfactant. Spermicides made with octoxynol-9 may be good alternatives for people who experience unpleasant reactions or allergies after using nonoxynol-9. Products which contain octoxynol-9 include Koromex Cream and Ortho-Gynol Jelly. https://buyspermicide.com/spermicide.html

Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) effects on female reproductive organ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8473002

DEPO-PROVERA CI for intramuscular (IM) injection is available in vials and prefilled syringes, each containing 1 mL of medroxyprogesterone acetate sterile aqueous suspension 150 mg/mL.
Each mL contains:


Medroxyprogesterone acetate 150 mg
Polyethylene glycol 3350 28.9 mg
Polysorbate 80 2.41 mg
Sodium chloride 8.68 mg
Methylparaben 1.37 mg
Propylparaben 0.150 mg
Water for injection qs
When necessary, pH is adjusted with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid, or both.
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/archives/fdaDrugInfo.cfm?archiveid=11565

Anthrax immunization is said to raise the risk of infertility, multiple sclerosis and lupus. ... and disabilities that many soldiers have experienced following anthrax vaccination. (The anthrax vaccine contains Squalene) https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/54400.php

Assessment of spermicides by a stripping technique http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/51/2/383.full.pdf

Minimum concentrations of reagents to produce 100% stripping
of human spermatozoa
Cone,

(pmol/cell)
Triisopropylnaphthalene sulphonic acid sodium salt (Serva) 77-6
Triton X-100 (Merck) 43-7
TV-Dodecylpyridinium chloride (Merck) 31-6
Sodium deoxycholate (Merck) 26-9
Triton N-101 (Sigma) 24-0
N-Lauroylsarcosine sodium salt (Sigma) 12-6
Benzethonium chloride (Serva) 6 3
Benzalkonium chloride (Merck) 4-57
Teepol 710 (Serva) 3-09
Sodium lauryl sulphate (Merck) 3-02
Hyamine 10X (Sigma) 1-82
Saponin (Merck; B.D.H.) 0-955
CTAB (Merck) 0-794
Cetylpyridinium chloride (Merck) 0-468

Diabetes: Vaccination and Environmental Insult

Childhood Vaccinations and
Juvenile-Onset (Type-1) Diabetes

Testimony before the Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies
April 16, 1997 
http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Diabetes/congressionalhearing.aspx

A Diabetes Link to Meat

http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/01/a-diabetes-link-to-meat

Eating meat linked to higher risk of diabetes

Date:
September 5, 2017
Source:
Duke-NUS Medical School
Summary:
Higher intake of red meat and poultry is associated with significantly increased risk of developing diabetes, which is partially attributed to their higher content of heme iron in these meats, new research shows.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/09/170905134506.htm
 2017 Aug 18. pii: S1631-0691(17)30124-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2017.07.003. [Epub ahead of print]

Environmental endocrine disruptors: New diabetogens?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28826789

Juvenile Diabetes and Vaccination:
New Evidence for a Connection

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Diabetes/juvenilediabetes.aspx

Vaccines, not Diet, are Causing Epidemic of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes According to New Paper from Classen Immunotherapies

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-not-diet-are-causing-epidemic-of-obesity-and-type-2-diabetes-according-to-new-paper-from-classen-immunotherapies-300479316.html

Thimerosal-containing Hepatitis B Vaccine Exposure is Highly Associated with Childhood Obesity: A Case-control Study Using the Vaccine Safety Datalink.

Geier DA, et al. N Am J Med Sci. 2016.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27583238/

Vaccinations may induce diabetes-related autoantibodies in one-year-old children.

Wahlberg J, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/14679101/

Environmental Triggers and Determinants of Type 1 Diabetes

Vaccinations ruin natural immunity.

More vaccine truths. - Compiled by Lee Stevenson
Vaccines are contaminated.
The supposed pathogens protect us.
Germ theory proven wrong.
Vaccinated do not develop immunity but unvaccinated do.
HPV vaccine causes a high rate of adverse reactions.
Higher rate of mortality in vaccinated.
Vaccination ruins the ability to develop immunity.
Vaccinagtions make you more succeptable to disease.
Natural measles prevents allergies, vaccinations cause them.
Hidden agenda.
Vaccinations cause more virulant diseases.
Nope vaccine autism debate is not over even some vaccine inserts prove that because they list autism as an adverse event from vaccination.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Childhood illnesses are beneficial


THE BENEFICIAL NATURE OF CHILDHOOD INFECTIONS

AUTHOR // Ian Sinclair
In reality, the symptoms do not constitute the disease but the cure. In other words, measles is not the disease but the cure. Whooping cough is not the disease but the cure. Chickenpox is not the disease but the cure. The real disease is toxaemia out of which the symptoms arise. This will explain the words of Hippocrates, who to this day is referred to as the Father of Medicine. Over 2000 years ago he wrote:
“ Diseases are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defences of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.”
By clearly understanding the true purpose of symptoms, the beneficial nature of childhood infections becomes readily apparent. These so-called infections serve to restore internal purity thereby promoting the health of the child. This will explain why natural health practitioners make no attempt to suppress these symptoms, instead they believe that the symptoms should be allowed to run their course so that complete detoxification is achieved.

 1998 Oct;51(4):315-20.

Febrile infectious childhood diseases in the history of cancer patients and matched controls.

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that febrile infectious childhood diseases (FICDs) are associated with a lower cancer risk in adulthood,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9824838

Are there any benefits from getting measles?

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/dis/
There are studies that suggest a link between naturally acquired measles infection and a reduced risk of Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, as well as a reduced risk of atopic diseases such as hay fever, eczema and asthma.12-16 In addition, measles infections are associated with a lower risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease in adulthood.17Moreover, infants born to mothers who have had naturally acquired measles are protected from measles via maternal immunity longer than infants born to vaccinated mothers.18



BMJ: Homeopathy is Good Medicine

BMJ 2012345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6184 (Published 14 September 2012)Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e6184
http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e6184/rr/606486

To say homeopathy is nothing but placebo requires turning a blind eye to a large amount of data which, though not completely conclusive, certainly suggests otherwise. It is clear that those who issue boilerplate criticisms of homeopathy have not bothered to consider the entirety of the data. Intelligent people and true scientists should be embarrassed by this and most ‘discussions’ taking place about homeopathy in the British medical community – they are an affront to scientific principles of rationality and objectivity.

The fact is, the weight of the evidence strongly favors homeopathic remedies being biological active agents.
Nearly all physico-chemical research – conducted by scientists of the very highest skill on earth, such as Rustum Roy and Jayesh Bellare – demonstrates physical properties of homeopathic remedies which are distinct from those of plain water or succussed/diluted water controls. None of the research is completely beyond reproach, but it is nevertheless quite strong and viewed as a whole becomes stronger.
The in vitro evidence is similarly strong – with a recent review finding that over 2/3 of all high quality studies demonstrate biological activity of homeopathic remedies. The same is true for nearly 3/4 of all replications.
The clinical evidence is less consistent, but this is because of the enormous heterogeneity of the literature – with many different types of homeopathy being studied, often by people who know nothing of homeopathy or lack the skills specific to the performance of homeopathic trials. Viewed as a whole, 41% of all RTC’s come to positive conclusions, while 52% are inconclusive; 7% are actually negative. These numbers correlate almost precisely with RCT’s of conventional medical therapies.
Systematic reviews have come to positive conclusions for, so far, the following conditions: allergies and upper respiratory infections, childhood diarrhea, influenza treatment, post-operative ileus, rheumatic diseases, seasonal allergic rhinitis, vertigo and most recently, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome
Homeopathic critics, if they cite any evidence, seem to universally cite only one study – the Shang, et al meta-analysis (Lancet, 2005). They may as well have referenced no data at all, since Shang is an abomination of science – failing nearly every conventional norm for high quality research (e.g. failing to meet multiple QUOROM criteria for systematic reviews) – and basing its conclusions on 8 out of 110 cherry picked trials. No sensitivity analysis was performed, but in subsequent independent assessment, literally every single other manner of assessing the data comes up positive for homeopathy. The 8 selected trials fail the ‘leave one out’ cross-validation test – take out the study looking at use of Arnica for soreness in marathon runners (a completely irrelevant research question with zero external validity) and the conclusions reverse dramatically (in favor of homeopathy). In other words, Shang is a sham. But clearly for critics it represents the pinnacle of research science since it supposedly ‘debunks’ homeopathy. No mention is ever made of all the other meta-analyses - which come to positive ends and are of far higher quality than Shang.
The homeopathic literature is not without deficiencies, but to say homeopathy is nothing but placebo requires turning a blind eye to a large amount of data which, though not completely conclusive, certainly suggests otherwise. It is clear that those who issue boilerplate criticisms of homeopathy have not bothered to consider the entirety of the data. Intelligent people and true scientists should be embarrassed by this and most ‘discussions’ taking place about homeopathy in the British medical community – they are an affront to scientific principles of rationality and objectivity.